What is happening to freedom of speech in America? The recent backlash against Stephen Colbert, Kathy Griffin, and Bill Maher over jokes which may be offensive and inappropriate is frightening. The attempts to intimidate and silence these comedians is based on the same mentality used by those extremists who tried to silence Salman Rushdie, Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, Charlie Hebdo, as well as countless others.
Anyone who finds a joke or any other comment offensive has every right to express their opinion. Where I part company is in the demand by these people for sanctions against these entertainers.
It may not be funny to me. It may be offensive and degrading. They are just words and images. They are meant as jokes even if they miss the mark. Look at the source. I have been involved in the comedy business as a lawyer for over 30 years. Some comics are crass, ignorant, and not funny. I have rarely, if ever, seen a comic who was malicious. By and large most are trying to entertain and make people laugh. They try to find humour through observation and commentary on life through a lens with their own unique perspective. It is not easy to put yourself out there.
Then there are a class of comics who stand out from the rest. They are smart and politically savvy. Part of their comic DNA is based in their sense of social justice and their desire to affect awareness and positive change on pressing social and political issues. They remind us of the realities and hypocrisies of the world around us.
As long as it is done in that spirit, whether or not it is funny or offensive, it is important that the right to express it is not impeded by intimidation from those who disagree. If that right and responsibility is not vigorously defended, and preserved it will be the first dagger in the heart of freedom. Sorry, that would be the second dagger in the heart of freedom. Donald Trump is the first.
The Conservative party has done it again. They have chosen a leader who is unknown while spurning the more politically attractive candidate. They did this in 1979 with Joe Clark. We all know how that turned out.
The Liberals did it twice with Dion and Ignatieff. We all know how that worked out.
Canada has generally been governed from the left-centre to the centre historically. The choice of a leader farther to the right may not have been the best direction.
Scheer has been described as Harper with a smile. His choice can only be good news for the Liberals.
Will he be impeached and if so when? One of the most important factors in the impeachment of a president is the Vice President. If Spiro Agnew had remained Vice President, Richard Nixon would have never faced impeachment.
If you impeach the President, whoever is to step into his shoes, will highlight different agendas for Republicans and Democrats.
For the Democrats the answer is easy. They don’t want Pence. He is a real conservative who would be harder than Trump to attack, and more dangerous to the social issues that are dear to their heart .
Wait till after the midterms when they may well win the House and Senate. Given the results of the last election those Democrats who stayed home will be highly motivated.
Given the relationship between Trump and Pence, it is not hard to imagine that investigations will find the VP tainted with the sins of the Trump campaign and administration.
If the Democrats are successful in impeaching both Trump and Pence, then the Speaker of The House, in this scenario a Democrat, would become President.
The Republicans have their own set of problems. They would prefer Pence. Their problem is the President is popular amongst Republicans. To force him out would alienate a lot of voters they need. Can they wait till the mid terms? Risky.
I am not a psychiatrist. Nor am I a psychologist. I have no formal training in the workings of the mind and their manifestations in the personalities they exhibit. I do have a lifetime of experience including the practice of law which gives me some perspective on people’s motivation and behaviour. You get to meet almost every kind of personality disorder and neuroses there is.
Is it just me? Is it not clear to everyone that this President is nakedly exhibiting behavior that leads to the inescapable conclusion that he suffers from multiple character flaws and mental health issues? As a pathological liar, Trump believes his own lies. It is obvious to anyone, except his diehard supporters. Can the Congress not get 100 or even 1000 of the top of the mental health field who can identify what’s wrong with this guy.
Prepare reports. Call eminent witnesses. Prove that Trump is mentally unfit for and dangerous to the office of the Presidency, the people of United States of America and the world. If that’s not grounds to remove a president I don’t know what is.
It is often a difficult task to determine the truth in a courtroom. Technology has played its part in making it a little easier.
The introduction of DNA evidence took a lot of guesswork out of the identification of one or another parties in the proceedings. Its use has advanced justice and prevented or corrected injustice.
Developments in the use of electronic media have changed the way we live. One can no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The cell phone has made it possible and common to video any incident.
The use of recorded conversations in litigation once carried the stigma of the government eavesdropping on criminals and foreign governments. It generally required an order from a judge. A bias against the use of recordings, legally obtained still lives on in the minds of some judges.
I have had judges express negativity to this kind of evidence. The law in Canada requires only that one party to the communication consents. That means that any time you find yourself in a conversation you can record it without advising the other person.
What better evidence could you have of a conversation than a recording. One would think this would be embraced by fact finder’s as it makes their job so much easier.
Recorded conversations have come to my aid on many occasions when someone else has a “alternate perception” of the facts. I most certainly record all calls with institutions and service people. It helps when they don’t live up to their promises and try to deny them.
We live in the 21st century. One must recognize that almost anything you say or do could be recorded. All you can do is live your life and hope that one day you do not wake up to find that something you regret is now trending on YouTube.
Truth like water finds its own level. Like water it also finds its own path. It can be slowed and diverted but will always seek and eventually find its place.
In this blog, I will attempt to help truth find it’s level. I am doing this as cathartic therapeutic, exercise and for my children to have know their father. They don’t seem to be to focused or interested now.
I write through the eyes of 60+ years of life. I kept notes on my thoughts and insights all of my life. I rarely reviewed, and long ago lost them. Before the internet, there was no opportunity to put thoughts and perspectives out there and possibly get feedback to confirm that I am not the only one who sees the universe this way.
I hope to have fun while getting it off my chest.
If you happen to read it , I hope you find it entertaining, enlightening, and perhaps thought-provoking.